BGonline.org Forums
Two Tough Checker Plays
Posted By: ah_clem
Date: Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:18 p.m.
In Response To: Two Tough Checker Plays (Paul Weaver)
I didn't see 8/4 6/4(2).
That leaves a 3 3 5 structure vs a 2 5 4 structure. The spare on the four is probably more flexible, so I'll go with 8/4 6/4(2) instead of 8/4(2).
Messages In This Thread
- Two Tough Checker Plays
Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 7:18 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
David Rennie -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:04 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:05 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:05 p.m.
- +1 *NM*
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:27 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
MishyPoo -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:17 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 8:18 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
mandm1951 -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 9:06 p.m.
- No Responders Have Yet Mentioned The Best Plays
Paul Weaver -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 10:29 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
Keene -- Tuesday, 21 January 2014, at 11:19 p.m.
- Two Tough Checker Plays
Wayne Jeffcoat -- Wednesday, 22 January 2014, at 6:07 a.m.
- Rollout Results Posted
Paul Weaver -- Wednesday, 22 January 2014, at 6:16 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.