Posted By: Maik Stiebler In Response To: PR xg-gnu-snowie-bgblitz (Michael Petch)
Date: Wednesday, 29 January 2014, at 2:29 p.m.
In Response To: PR xg-gnu-snowie-bgblitz (Michael Petch)
that suggested that GNUBG's Error Rate was about 1.4 times higher than Snowie 4's error rate
I'm surprised about that. Or maybe misunderstanding you. GNUBG error rate is typically in the ballpark of 2.0 times the Snowie equivalent error rate as measured by GNUBG, isn't it? After all, I understand that XG introduced the multiplication by 500 as a way to counteract that 2.0 factor inflation to get its numbers more in line with the still-standard-at-the-time Snowie ER numbers.
So are you saying that Snowie ER as measured by Snowie 4 is typically about 40% higher than Snowie equivalent ER as measured by GNUBG with the old nets?
Messages In This Thread
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.