[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

42P-63S-31X-21@-63Z-64R-32S-52T-63R-62R-31

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Wednesday, 23 April 2014, at 10:47 p.m.

In Response To: 42P-63S-31X-21@-63Z-64R-32S-52T-63R-62R-31 (Nack Ballard)





White is Player 1

score: 0
pip: 137
Unlimited Game
Jacoby Beaver
pip: 153
score: 0

Blue is Player 2
XGID=----b-E-E---dDaA-b-d-b----:0:0:-1:31:0:0:3:0:10

65R-32S-41T-21@-41T-42P-63R-31






White is Player 2

score: 0
pip: 137
Unlimited Game
Jacoby Beaver
pip: 151
score: 0

Blue is Player 1
XGID=----B-DB--aAdD---e-e-B----:0:0:1:13:0:0:3:0:10

42P-63S-31X-21@-63Z-64R-32S-52T-63R-62R-31

Without playing the QF game, I confess that my OTB play in both positions is d (down) = 13/10*/9. As I stated in my earlier post, I donít want to make the 10pt because the 4pt, six pips away, is already made. The two donít work well together.

Including meta-data as part of the calculation, such as QF and the implication that the two positions require different handling, I would adjust as follows. The difference must be the made 7pt. In the new position, that makes it unreasonable to play Snuaís alternative, D (Down) = 13/10*, 8/7. Therefore, let me guess that D is correct in the initial position and the more conventional d is best in the new one.

As Stick pointed out earlier, not hitting does not make sense, so A (Attack) = 8/5 6/5 should be taken off the table in the original position.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.