[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

52S-11E-64@-44

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 8 September 2014, at 5:10 p.m.

In Response To: 52S-11E-64@-44 (Fatboy)

In retrospect, I recognize this error of mine as a familiar one: thinking that an early 44 puts me ahead more than it does. The roll is 44, not 66, so running is not going to be better than the natural 13/9(2), unstacking and making a good point.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.