|
BGonline.org Forums
Suggested Idea for Performance Grading
Posted By: Tenland In Response To: Suggested Idea for Performance Grading (Rick Janowski)
Date: Friday, 3 October 2014, at 11:01 p.m.
In my opinion it is not so much the lack of cube decisions that does it (although surely most of us have a higher cube PR than checker play PR), but the fact that games are played to completion, meaning you get credit for quite a lot of trivial plays, such as the bearoff.
In addition to this, DMP equities don't involve gammons (for obvious reasons), and are not amplified by the opponent's ability to cube, implying that a .04 error at DMP can most of the time be considered a bigger mistake than a .04 error at other scores - maybe this is the reason a .06 error is considered a blunder by XG, even though it normally has the borderline blunder at .08?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.