Is this the position you refer to? Maybe I have understand something wrong as here 66 seems to be better than 21:
| 1. | Rollout1 | 7/4 | eq: -1,000 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:0,00% B:0,00%) | Conf.: ± 0,000 (-1,000...-1,000) - [20,0%]
Duration: 1,3 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 7/5 3/2 | eq: -1,000 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 0,02% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,98% (G:0,00% B:0,00%) | Conf.: ± 0,000 (-1,000...-1,000) - [20,0%]
Duration: 1,2 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 6/5 6/4 | eq: -1,000 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,99% (G:0,00% B:0,00%) | Conf.: ± 0,000 (-1,000...-1,000) - [20,0%]
Duration: 1,3 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout1 | 6/4 3/2 | eq: -1,000 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,99% (G:0,02% B:0,00%) | Conf.: ± 0,000 (-1,000...-1,000) - [20,0%]
Duration: 0,9 second |
|
| 5. | Rollout1 | 7/6 3/1 | eq: -1,000 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 0,01% (G:0,00% B:0,00%)
99,99% (G:0,03% B:0,00%) | Conf.: ± 0,000 (-1,000...-1,000) - [20,0%]
Duration: 1,1 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
Regarding the position that I posted I suppose the best rolls would be 11 and 22 that save the gammon in all cases. As worst I would expect to be any rolls that are not doubles and at the same time do not fill the gaps of 5 and 4 points. 13 should be the worst or at least equal to the worst rolls.
