|
BGonline.org Forums
Get rid of the XG Opening Book?
Posted By: Taper_Mike In Response To: make it as simple as possible but not simpler (Mike Clapsadle)
Date: Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 9:31 p.m.
Of course, I don't suppose either of you are suggesting we do away with the XG Opening Book.
David Rockwell (and many others) have made the several thousand rollouts that make the OB possible. Without those rollouts, there would be no OB. So, how should we name those rollout files? If we don’t use Nactation to name them, what other system is there?
Naming rollout files is just one of the uses of Nactation. I outline a couple of others in my post Why I Like Nactation.
As Stick has pointed out, there is no point in debating the issue. Those of us who find Nactation to be a valuable tool are going to continue to use it. Those who do not, won’t. So, I don’t see a problem. We are not complaining because you guys won’t use Nactation. Why should you bemoan that fact that we do?
Mike
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.