BGonline.org Forums

Get rid of the XG Opening Book?

Posted By: Mike Clapsadle
Date: Friday, 14 November 2014, at 2:50 a.m.

In Response To: Get rid of the XG Opening Book? (Taper_Mike)

Thanks for the insight. I wasn't trying to start an argument, just an honest question.

What you mentioned about needing a shorthand to name positions in the OB makes sense.

Messages In This Thread

• Nactation help
  David Rockwell -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 1:25 a.m.
  • Nactation – Algorithm for the Hit Convention
    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 5:41 a.m.
    • Correction – 8/5(2) should be 8/3(2)
      Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 5:49 a.m.
    • Nactation – Algorithm for the Hit Convention
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 19 November 2014, at 10:23 p.m.
      • Nactation – Algorithm for the Hit Convention
        David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 19 November 2014, at 11:09 p.m.
      • Nactation – 43D-65R-55
        Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 20 November 2014, at 3:50 a.m.
  • make it as simple as possible but not simpler
    rambiz -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 8:38 a.m.
    • make it as simple as possible but not simpler
      Mike Clapsadle -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 5:22 p.m.
      • Get rid of the XG Opening Book?
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 9:31 p.m.
        • Get rid of the XG Opening Book?
          Mike Clapsadle -- Friday, 14 November 2014, at 12:12 a.m.
          • Get rid of the XG Opening Book?
            Taper_Mike -- Friday, 14 November 2014, at 1:42 a.m.
            • Get rid of the XG Opening Book?
              Mike Clapsadle -- Friday, 14 November 2014, at 2:50 a.m.
      • make it as simple as possible but not simpler
        Michael Petch -- Thursday, 13 November 2014, at 11:45 p.m.
    • make it as simple as possible but not simpler
      Casper Van der Tak -- Friday, 14 November 2014, at 12:17 a.m.
    • make it as simple as possible but not simpler
      eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 14 November 2014, at 4:27 a.m.