[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Blasphmey Blasphmey Desecration of XG

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Monday, 12 January 2015, at 4:11 a.m.

In Response To: Blasphmey Blasphmey Desecration of XG (HOMINID)

Hominid:

The thread you appear to be responding to is this one:

http://www.bgonline.org/forums/webbbs_config.pl?noframes;read=170356

Posting under the thread you are responding to might make it easier for others to figure out what you are talking about. Certainly it makes the rest of the discussion easier to find. If you can find the thread, you can post under it.

That said, I can't make sense of your challenge to Timothy to prove to you that he understands why 6/1 there is a blunder.

6/1 is not a blunder. Nobody in that thread, including Timothy, claimed it was.

I believe Timothy's point was that Keane's explanation that saving 6's and 5's to play was of extreme importance didn't jive with two facts: (1) 7/2, which does not save two sixes, did very well in the analyses that Stick posted, and (2) 6/1, which does save two sixes, was apparently analyzed by XG as a blunder.

I gather that Timothy inferred that if 6/1 had not been analyzed as a blunder, it would have been among the top five plays according to Stick's XG analyze.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.