BGonline.org Forums

bearoff cube decision AtS

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 6:20 p.m.

In Response To: bearoff cube decision AtS (Bob Koca)

Janowski's "Live Cube (x=1.0)" assumes perfectly efficient cube ownership equity (that is the x=1.0 part). He goes further to define "General Cube" to account for the non-unity value of x, leaving it as a parameter.

This is why I was confused by Stick's post -- I thought he meant the general case or typical general case, such as using x=0.7 or x=2/3, which works pretty well in most cases, but not here (as I detail in my followup post above).

Messages In This Thread

• bearoff cube decision AtS
  Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 17 January 2015, at 4:11 p.m.
  • bearoff cube decision AtS
    Stick -- Saturday, 17 January 2015, at 4:23 p.m.
    • bearoff cube decision AtS
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 19 January 2015, at 5:54 p.m.
      • bearoff cube decision AtS
        Stick -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 6:13 a.m.
        • bearoff cube decision AtS
          Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 6:36 a.m.
          • bearoff cube decision AtS
            Stick -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 7:30 a.m.
            • bearoff cube decision AtS
              Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 7:50 a.m.
              • bearoff cube decision AtS
                Stick -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 8:06 a.m.
                • bearoff cube decision AtS
                  Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 20 January 2015, at 8:33 a.m.
                  • bearoff cube decision AtS
                    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 6:20 p.m.
  • bearoff cube decision AtS
    John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 17 January 2015, at 9:50 p.m.
  • bearoff cube decision AtS
    Igor -- Sunday, 18 January 2015, at 5:57 a.m.
  • bearoff cube decision AtS
    Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 6:56 p.m.