BGonline.org Forums
XG Option that should be standard
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Saturday, 24 January 2015, at 10:16 p.m.
In Response To: XG Option that should be standard (Dmitriy Obukhov)
Ah, I think I see. So for example, we sometimes see people justify a seemingly "bad take" by appealing to a fish MET. But we never seem to see people pull out a fish MET to show that their seemingly "good take" was actually a bad take.
Messages In This Thread
- XG Option that should be standard
roadkillbooks -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 7:01 a.m.
- It's only the tip of an iceberg anyway
niuniuch -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 9:24 a.m.
- BTW why do my posts sometimes disappear?
niuniuch -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 9:26 a.m.
- XG Option that should be standard
Phil simborg -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 1:40 p.m.
- XG Option that should be standard
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 22 January 2015, at 1:54 p.m.
- XG Option that should be standard
Rick Janowski -- Friday, 23 January 2015, at 4:24 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.