BGonline.org Forums

My play was a .242 blunder - XG++

Posted By: Michael Depreli
Date: Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 3:57 p.m.

In Response To: My play was a .242 blunder - XG++ (RealNick)

I'm posting this is because I can't figure out is why my choice is so bad compared to second best.

A few reasons:

Less immediate potential to complete the six prime.
More potentially escaping numbers from the bar for white.
Compare how much better for white it is when he enters with 1X.

Michael

Messages In This Thread

• My play was a .242 blunder
  RealNick -- Tuesday, 27 January 2015, at 11:50 p.m.
  • My play was a .242 blunder
    Mick Z -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 1:15 a.m.
  • My play was a .242 blunder
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 1:18 a.m.
  • My play was a .242 blunder
    Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 3:14 a.m.
    • My play was a .242 blunder
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 10:10 a.m.
  • My play was a .242 blunder - XG++
    RealNick -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 2:59 p.m.
    • My play was a .242 blunder - XG++
      Mick Z -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 3:27 p.m.
    • My play was a .242 blunder - XG++
      Michael Depreli -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 3:57 p.m.
    • My play was a .242 blunder - XG++
      Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 28 January 2015, at 4:27 p.m.