BGonline.org Forums

RO & a variation

Posted By: Kevin Finch
Date: Tuesday, 10 February 2015, at 8:16 p.m.

In Response To: RO & a variation (John O'Hagan)

Thanks for all of the different variations.

Confirms my intuition that you need to hit in the OP due to the fact that your back position is so weak. Your only real chance to win the game is to corral the back man.

Messages In This Thread

• 41 for White
  John O'Hagan -- Saturday, 7 February 2015, at 3:31 p.m.
  • 41 for White
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 8 February 2015, at 12:49 a.m.
    • 41 for White
      neilkaz -- Sunday, 8 February 2015, at 2:57 a.m.
    • 41 for White
      Igor -- Sunday, 8 February 2015, at 3:22 a.m.
    • 41 for White
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 8 February 2015, at 6:19 p.m.
  • RO & a variation
    John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 8 February 2015, at 11:05 p.m.
    • Another variation
      vidvis -- Monday, 9 February 2015, at 2:57 a.m.
    • A variation with same pip count difference as OP
      neilkaz -- Monday, 9 February 2015, at 9:17 p.m.
    • RO & a variation
      Kevin Finch -- Tuesday, 10 February 2015, at 8:16 p.m.