BGonline.org Forums
Tough defending vs. backgame play
Posted By: Alex Schofield
Date: Friday, 3 April 2015, at 5:05 p.m.
In Response To: Tough defending vs. backgame play (John O'Hagan)
I'd probably play 20/11. My goal is to just let him play and hope he rolls 44 or 55 and his front game will crush like a beer can under a monster truck.
Messages In This Thread
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 3:57 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Alex Schofield -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 5:05 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Fatboy -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 5:12 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Igor -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 5:17 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Wolfgang -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 6:14 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 3 April 2015, at 8:11 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 April 2015, at 3:21 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
Sean Garber -- Saturday, 4 April 2015, at 6:50 p.m.
- Tough defending vs. backgame play
gudgen -- Tuesday, 7 April 2015, at 12:46 a.m.
- OTB & RO
John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 7 April 2015, at 8:45 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.