BGonline.org Forums

Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed

Posted By: Ray Kershaw
Date: Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 8:39 a.m.

In Response To: Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed (Timothy Chow)

By "overestimate" do you mean overestimate of the equity after a given play? If so and if this overestimate applies to all plays, will there be any bias in the ranking of the plays which is what we are interested in?

Messages In This Thread

• Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
  Timothy Chow -- Friday, 10 April 2015, at 11:42 p.m.
  • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
    Phil simborg -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 1:22 a.m.
    • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 3:38 p.m.
  • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
    Bob Koca -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 2:01 a.m.
  • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
    David Rockwell -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 2:20 a.m.
    • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 4:06 p.m.
  • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
    Maik Stiebler -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 7:31 a.m.
    • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 4:19 p.m.
      • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
        Tom Keith -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 6:34 p.m.
        • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
          Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 12 April 2015, at 6:31 p.m.
  • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
    Ray Kershaw -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 8:39 a.m.
    • Variance reduction is unbiased but may be skewed
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 11 April 2015, at 4:24 p.m.