BGonline.org Forums

31P-65R-42P-21D-42

Posted By: David Rennie
Date: Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 4:28 p.m.

In Response To: 31P-65R-42P-21D-42 (John O'Hagan)

I can see the merits of 2D or the minor split here. Splitting is nice to activate our back men while his board is undeveloped, but 2D duplicates 61, 62, and 64 nicely and making our bar point would be a very good thing here. The split also dupes 62 and 61. At least it does two things. I'd say 24/22 13/9.

Messages In This Thread

• 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
  John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 4:00 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    David Rennie -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 4:28 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 4:59 p.m.
    • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
      David Rockwell -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 7:54 p.m.
      • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
        neilkaz -- Friday, 26 June 2015, at 4:19 a.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    Casper Van der Tak -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 5:33 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    Igor -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 5:52 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    Fatboy -- Thursday, 25 June 2015, at 11:17 p.m.
  • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 26 June 2015, at 3:12 a.m.
    • 31P-65R-42P-21D-42
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 26 June 2015, at 9:11 a.m.
  • OTB & RO
    John O'Hagan -- Friday, 26 June 2015, at 11:06 p.m.
    • 42P-64R-31P-21Z-42 (one pip different), Rollout
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 27 June 2015, at 5:34 p.m.