[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

New Paper on Opening Replies

Posted By: Stick
Date: Friday, 3 July 2015, at 5:00 a.m.

In Response To: New Paper on Opening Replies (Jeremy Bagai)

I would have left off the bizarre and almost never occurring opening rolls of 32Z and 43U for sure. In fact, I wouldn't lose any sleep omitting 62R or 62$. I can not remember one instance of an opponent ever playing one of the former in any tournament situation. The latter two a pure rarity at best. No need to speak up those of you who see these played. I'm sure it exists somewhere but so does 52$ or 65S.

We've had the question of who owns a match if it's recorded, the players or is it public record and the question of publishing positions from a book come up. I'm wondering with something like this is it theoretically completely kosher or could GV or the author of the influence (that's me) make a stink about it and be justified? I don't care and I can't speak for GV but I'm sure they don't give a shit either, but wondered about it 'in theory'.

At the end of all GV articles they tag it: Article text Copyright © 1999-2015 Stick and GammonVillage Inc.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.