|
BGonline.org Forums
A blunder that wasn't a blunder
Posted By: hominid In Response To: A blunder that wasn't a blunder (Phil Simborg)
Date: Tuesday, 8 December 2015, at 3:16 p.m.
I have been messing with XG analysis for some time. Do I beleive in my results? oh yes. Do I know what I'm doing? not really. Get the settings wrong and a simple position can take days. I thought I had a fast machine lol. If one needs to do a rollout on an obviously complex position
Do not use the presets
Do not use Variance reduction
Do not use a mobile unless you have enough charisma to convince the present company that it could be correct.
This position is similar to a recent post. It demonstrates attack/defence, passive defence. I am happy with both concepts and on the day would adopt passive, less brain work. The object lesson is an awareness of the options.
It took 3 hours for 6/3*to get to the top then it yielded to bar/16, which yielded to bar/19 7/4. I will not be extending the rollout to obtain a 100% result theres monsters to kill. On the day any of the three plays is a winner the equity difference being miniscule and none of the 3 rolls are blunders. This rollout was at 7 ply for 7 hours I'm not sure which part of it though !!
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.