BGonline.org Forums

LAPSUS CUBUS ?

Posted By: Neil Robins
Date: Sunday, 20 December 2015, at 12:27 a.m.

In Response To: LAPSUS CUBUS ? (Timothy Chow)

Yes and also XG is terrible at correctly identifying what is clearly an optional double compared to GNU. XGR++ often reports optional doubles at -2-2 as doubles or as no doubles by 0.005 or more.

Messages In This Thread

• LAPSUS CUBUS ?
  adrianov -- Tuesday, 15 December 2015, at 4:13 p.m.
  • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
    Casper Van der Tak -- Tuesday, 15 December 2015, at 4:37 p.m.
  • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 15 December 2015, at 5:11 p.m.
  • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
    Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 15 December 2015, at 11:33 p.m.
    • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
      Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 16 December 2015, at 1:37 a.m.
      • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
        Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 16 December 2015, at 4:04 a.m.
        • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
          Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 16 December 2015, at 6:39 a.m.
          • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
            Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 16 December 2015, at 11:03 p.m.
            • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
              Neil Robins -- Sunday, 20 December 2015, at 12:27 a.m.
              • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
                Bob Koca -- Sunday, 20 December 2015, at 12:33 a.m.
              • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
                neilkaz -- Friday, 25 December 2015, at 9:00 p.m.
                • LAPSUS CUBUS ?
                  Bob Koca -- Saturday, 26 December 2015, at 6:09 a.m.