BGonline.org Forums

Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?

Posted By: Casper Van der Tak
Date: Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 8:48 a.m.

In Response To: Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you? (Timothy Chow)

I would do nothing here. We are behind in the race by quite a bit, White has a lot of checkers in the zone, and White may leave a direct (6s are difficult).

Messages In This Thread

• Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
  Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 12:35 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Chase -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 3:36 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Karol Szczerek -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 6:32 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Casper Van der Tak -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 8:48 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Mick Z -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 1:44 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    hominid -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 4:31 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    ah_clem -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 5:23 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    johnk -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 7:28 p.m.
  • Rollout and commentary
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 2:36 a.m.
    • Contrasting Variant
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:36 a.m.
      • Contrasting Variant
        Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 8:47 a.m.
        • Contrasting Variant
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:34 p.m.
          • Contrasting Variant
            Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:37 p.m.
      • Another Variant
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 5:33 p.m.
        • Another Variant
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 9:58 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 2:41 a.m.