BGonline.org Forums

Contrasting Variant

Posted By: Casper Van der Tak
Date: Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 8:47 a.m.

In Response To: Contrasting Variant (Nack Ballard)

Thanks Nack once again for the variant. What is the main factor here that causes the switch? The change in the race (making splitting more attractive) or White's slightly worse attack (especially considering how an immediate 11 and 55 play)?

Messages In This Thread

• Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
  Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 12:35 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Chase -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 3:36 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Karol Szczerek -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 6:32 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Casper Van der Tak -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 8:48 a.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    Mick Z -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 1:44 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    hominid -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 4:31 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    ah_clem -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 5:23 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    johnk -- Tuesday, 5 January 2016, at 7:28 p.m.
  • Rollout and commentary
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 2:36 a.m.
    • Contrasting Variant
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:36 a.m.
      • Contrasting Variant
        Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 8:47 a.m.
        • Contrasting Variant
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:34 p.m.
          • Contrasting Variant
            Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 4:37 p.m.
      • Another Variant
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 5:33 p.m.
        • Another Variant
          Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 9:58 p.m.
  • Risky-looking split: Do you or don't you?
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 6 January 2016, at 2:41 a.m.