BGonline.org Forums

One more thing about the Giants list

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 5:38 p.m.

In Response To: One more thing about the Giants list (Rick Janowski)

No. I believe it is a good thing to discuss changes to the system overall, ways it could be improved, even abolishing the entire thing. It is perfectly fine and correct to note that it may indeed be biased and even though I personally think it has no more bias than it has had in previous years (albeit biased towards different players), if it took recent events to bring that bias to voters' attention, that is a good thing.

Where I have a problem is saying that the list is totally meaningless, those who made the list are not Giants, there was fraud involved, and there needs to be a recount after throwing out people's votes. That is crossing a line.

Messages In This Thread

• One more thing about the Giants list
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 3:43 a.m.
  • One more thing about the Giants list +1 *NM*
    svilo -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 8:15 a.m.
  • One more thing about the Giants list
    Rick Janowski -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 1:35 p.m.
    • One more thing about the Giants list
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 5:38 p.m.
      • One more thing about the Giants list
        Leonardo Jerkovic -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 5:41 p.m.
      • One more thing about the Giants list
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 6:28 p.m.
  • One more thing about the Giants list + 1
    Bill Finneran -- Tuesday, 23 February 2016, at 2:41 p.m.