BGonline.org Forums

41$-52S-53 at GG

Posted By: HOMINID
Date: Friday, 3 June 2016, at 1:38 p.m.

In Response To: 41$-52S-53 at GG (John O'Hagan)

I can see the gammon potential here. I can also see 13/5 and a position I can understand. The unavoidable blot is in the least dangerous position. There is so much play here in the event that one makes a hit how on earth can anyone really understand the potential outcome.

I have noticed that in positions where there is a soft play and an aggressive play very often, after deep analysis on occasions the difference in equity is very little between the two. Recently the five point conundrum was posted. I responded with a make the five point. After deep analysis I was proved correct hurray. A rollout which took all of 9 min was posted which proved the point .I of course understood that this was completely inadequate only a deep rollout would suffice. For whatever reason I decided to do a deeper rollout which took days. I only prolonged it as I could not believe that making the five point was a huge blunder but it was so. In my opinion the best play when there is so much play is the one you are comfortable with.

I have just noticed that there is no cache setting in the rollout settings,that cant be right.I have been strangling my processor, goto to moan about something. My rollout has been going for two hours and looks to have a favourite but I won't hold my breath, another 12 hours to go.

Messages In This Thread

• 41$-52S-53 at GG
  John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 3:39 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 4:55 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    Keene -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 6:14 p.m.
    • 41$-52S-53 at GG
      neilkaz -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 2:25 a.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    HOMINID -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 1:38 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    Taper_Mike -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 6:48 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 8:18 p.m.
    • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
      Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 2:38 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:01 a.m.
        • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
          Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:09 a.m.
          • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
            Stick -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:36 a.m.
            • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
              Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 12:49 p.m.
              • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
                Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:44 p.m.
              • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
                Stick -- Monday, 6 June 2016, at 5:19 a.m.
          • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
            Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:37 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:44 p.m.
        • Some evidence
          Bob koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:48 p.m.
          • Some counter-evidence
            Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 11:11 p.m.
            • Some counter-evidence
              Bob Koca -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 1:09 a.m.
              • Some counter-evidence
                Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 11:32 a.m.
        • Playing the GG side requires more checker-play skill, on average, than defending against GG
          Jim Stutz -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 12:29 a.m.
          • Playing the GG side requires more checker-play skill, on average, than defending against GG
            Bob Koca -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 1:06 a.m.
            • Playing GG requires more checker-play skill, on average, than playing GS
              Jim Stutz -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 4:29 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Keene -- Monday, 6 June 2016, at 2:38 p.m.