BGonline.org Forums

13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:01 a.m.

In Response To: 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO (Jim Stutz)

If that reasoning is correct there should be a significant different in the results if the RO was done on lowly 1 ply instead. Hitting wins that RO also.

		White is Player 2 score: 1 pip: 160 2 point match Crawford pip: 162 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=-a-a-AD-CA--dD---d-e----B-:0:0:1:53:0:1:1:2:10
Blue to play 53

1.	Rollout1	8/5 8/3*	eq: +0.4124
	Player: Opponent: 52.46% (G:18.16% B:2.27%) 47.54% (G:22.48% B:3.40%) Conf.: ±0.0027 (+0.4098...+0.4151) - [100.0%] Duration: 6 minutes 29 seconds
2.	Rollout1	13/5	eq: +0.4033 (-0.0092)
	Player: Opponent: 53.20% (G:16.97% B:1.54%) 46.80% (G:19.46% B:2.04%) Conf.: ±0.0025 (+0.4007...+0.4058) - [0.0%] Duration: 5 minutes 51 seconds
3.	3-ply	8/3* 6/3	eq: +0.3896 (-0.0228)
	Player: Opponent: 52.69% (G:16.79% B:0.79%) 47.31% (G:13.46% B:0.87%)
4.	3-ply	9/4 8/5	eq: +0.3483 (-0.0642)
	Player: Opponent: 52.26% (G:15.15% B:0.56%) 47.74% (G:12.71% B:0.70%)
5.	2-ply	8/5 6/1*	eq: +0.3348 (-0.0776)
	Player: Opponent: 51.37% (G:15.37% B:0.49%) 48.63% (G:13.27% B:0.83%)
1 20736 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Dice Seed: 16132000 Moves and cube decisions: 1-ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10, MET: Rockwell-Kazaross

Messages In This Thread

• 41$-52S-53 at GG
  John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 3:39 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 4:55 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    Keene -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 6:14 p.m.
    • 41$-52S-53 at GG
      neilkaz -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 2:25 a.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    HOMINID -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 1:38 p.m.
  • 41$-52S-53 at GG
    Taper_Mike -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 6:48 p.m.
  • RO
    John O'Hagan -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 8:18 p.m.
    • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
      Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 2:38 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:01 a.m.
        • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
          Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:09 a.m.
          • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
            Stick -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:36 a.m.
            • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
              Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 12:49 p.m.
              • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
                Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:44 p.m.
              • Hey Stick, how do you say "prop" in French?
                Stick -- Monday, 6 June 2016, at 5:19 a.m.
          • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
            Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:37 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:44 p.m.
        • Some evidence
          Bob koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:48 p.m.
          • Some counter-evidence
            Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 11:11 p.m.
            • Some counter-evidence
              Bob Koca -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 1:09 a.m.
              • Some counter-evidence
                Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 11:32 a.m.
        • Playing the GG side requires more checker-play skill, on average, than defending against GG
          Jim Stutz -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 12:29 a.m.
          • Playing the GG side requires more checker-play skill, on average, than defending against GG
            Bob Koca -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 1:06 a.m.
            • Playing GG requires more checker-play skill, on average, than playing GS
              Jim Stutz -- Sunday, 5 June 2016, at 4:29 a.m.
      • 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
        Keene -- Monday, 6 June 2016, at 2:38 p.m.