BGonline.org Forums
Some evidence
Posted By: Bob koca
Date: Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:48 p.m.
In Response To: 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO (Chuck Bower)
I looked at GG player starting with 21. Compared to the existing RO both sides playing one ply gave almost .02 less equity to GG side.
Messages In This Thread
- 41$-52S-53 at GG
John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 3:39 p.m.
- 41$-52S-53 at GG
ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 4:55 p.m.
- 41$-52S-53 at GG
Keene -- Thursday, 2 June 2016, at 6:14 p.m.
- 41$-52S-53 at GG
HOMINID -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 1:38 p.m.
- 41$-52S-53 at GG
Taper_Mike -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 6:48 p.m.
- RO
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 3 June 2016, at 8:18 p.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 2:38 a.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 4:01 a.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Jim Stutz -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:09 a.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Stick -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:36 a.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Bob Koca -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:37 a.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 4 June 2016, at 5:44 p.m.
- 13-5 is the better choice for most, if not all, human players, IMO
Keene -- Monday, 6 June 2016, at 2:38 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.