BGonline.org Forums
Clock Irregularities Should Not Be Classed as Illegal Moves
Posted By: johnk
Date: Saturday, 11 June 2016, at 5:00 p.m.
In Response To: Clock Irregularities Should Not Be Classed as Illegal Moves (Taper_Mike)
I disagree that using legal moves in the Chicago ruling was absurd. It was ambiguous and probably the interpretation of most US players. I agree the rules of backgammon, under legal-moves-only and otherwise, need a new category to handle clock irregularities.
Messages In This Thread
- The basis for my ruling...
rory -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 6:50 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...
Bob Koca -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 7:25 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...
neilkaz -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 7:34 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...
Art Grater -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 7:54 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...put it to bed
Phil Simborg -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 9:04 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...
Joe Russell -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 9:28 p.m.
- The basis for my ruling...
Casper Van der Tak -- Friday, 10 June 2016, at 9:58 p.m.
- Clock Irregularities Should Not Be Classed as Illegal Moves
Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 11 June 2016, at 4:10 p.m.
- Clock Irregularities Should Not Be Classed as Illegal Moves
johnk -- Saturday, 11 June 2016, at 5:00 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.