BGonline.org Forums
bearing off question--no David, and why?
Posted By: garyo
Date: Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:35 p.m.
In Response To: bearing off question--no David, and why? (Phil Simborg)
it is more costly to miss with a 3 than miss with a 1 - fill higher gaps 1st (if all else is equal)
Messages In This Thread
- bearing off question
Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:11 a.m.
- bearing off question
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:20 a.m.
- bearing off question
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 1:13 p.m.
- bearing off question
David Rennie -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 1:52 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Phil Simborg -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 3:56 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Stick -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 3:59 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 4:06 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 7:32 p.m.
- bearing off question--no David, and why?
garyo -- Wednesday, 29 June 2016, at 9:35 p.m.
- bearing off question
David Rennie -- Thursday, 30 June 2016, at 2:56 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.