[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Does everybody agree PR is academic?

Posted By: Jack Mack
Date: Wednesday, 24 August 2016, at 12:25 a.m.

In Response To: Does everybody here know this? (Florin Popa)

thefreedictionary.com gives secondary meanings of "academic" as: Having little practical use or value, as by being overly detailed, unengaging, or theoretical. Having no important consequence or relevancy.

Now we are getting closer to Murat's not so scholarly statement that PR is just "concocted, fanciful, arbitrary, elaborate bullshit".

Different color, same smell..?

I don't know what you mean by "standard bg" but you make it sound so easy to manipulate PR that you would perhaps agree with Murat if he had used alternative words like "useless" or "meaningless" instead of "bullshit"..?

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.