BGonline.org Forums

62S-42H-11

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 3:54 p.m.

In Response To: 62S-42H-11 (Timothy Chow)

This may be relatively close. Obviously, the decision comes down to finding the best way to play the final ace. There are two choices: 24/23 and 11/10.

11/10 has the advantage of targeting the 4pt. In some ways, however, making that move is like playing the same checker down twice. It is already a builder for the 9pt and bar point. Is the gain on 62 and 64 worth more than the advantage of splitting the rear checkers? Note that 64 already plays fairly well from the 11pt.

24/23, on the other hand, does something new. It splits the rear checkers.

I'll go with that.

Bar/23, 6/5(2)

Mike

Messages In This Thread

• 62S-42H-11
  Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 4:48 p.m.
  • 62S-42H-11
    Fatboy -- Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 5:57 p.m.
  • 62S-42H-11
    Igor -- Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 8:01 p.m.
    • 62S-42H-11
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 11:13 p.m.
    • 62S-42H-11
      Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 3:58 p.m.
  • 62S-42H-11
    Keene -- Tuesday, 6 September 2016, at 9:37 p.m.
  • 62S-42H-11
    Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 3:54 p.m.
  • Rollout
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 5:27 p.m.
    • Rollout
      Igor -- Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 5:54 p.m.
  • 62S-42H-11
    Casper Van der Tak -- Wednesday, 7 September 2016, at 6:10 p.m.