BGonline.org Forums
4pt vs 9pt 9 (41Z-52Z-42)
Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Sunday, 25 September 2016, at 11:35 p.m.
Throwing in the Z's just to gratuitously fan the flames of the Convenience Clause debate.
| | White is Player 2
score: 0 pip: 160 | Unlimited Game | pip: 162 score: 0
Blue is Player 1 | |
XGID=-a-a--E-CA--dD---d-e---AA-:0:0:1:42:0:0:0:0:10 |
Blue to play 42 |
Messages In This Thread
- 4pt vs 9pt 9 (41Z-52Z-42)
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 25 September 2016, at 11:35 p.m.
- 4pt vs 9pt 9 (41Z-52Z-42)
John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 25 September 2016, at 11:58 p.m.
- 4pt vs 9pt 9 (41Z-52Z-42)
ah_clem -- Monday, 26 September 2016, at 3:27 p.m.
- 4pt vs 9pt 9 (41Z-52Z-42)
neilkaz -- Monday, 26 September 2016, at 6:40 p.m.
- Rollout
Timothy Chow -- Monday, 26 September 2016, at 9:35 p.m.
- Rollout
Casper Van der Tak -- Monday, 26 September 2016, at 9:42 p.m.
- Rollout
Karol Szczerek -- Tuesday, 27 September 2016, at 5:07 a.m.
- Rollout
Casper Van der Tak -- Tuesday, 27 September 2016, at 7:42 a.m.
- 41S-52S-42 – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollout
Taper_Mike -- Monday, 26 September 2016, at 10:29 p.m.
- 41S-52S-31 – No Jacoby, No Beavers – 3-ply XG2 Rollout
Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 27 September 2016, at 11:58 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.