|
BGonline.org Forums
Is XG violating GNUBG GPL?
Posted By: Jack Mack In Response To: Is XG violating GNUBG GPL? (Phil Simborg)
Date: Monday, 20 March 2017, at 8:33 a.m.
"I would care if eXtremeGammon was developed by breaking some legal or ethical codes."
Okay, fine. Let's see how do you care now.
"My statement about not caring about how it provides me with good information is based on my assumption and belief that no legal or ethical code had been broken."
I apologize for misunderstanding. Now that you have set me straight, tell me what you would have said differently if you had not "assumed and believed that no legal or ethical code had been broken"?
For the sake of fairness, can you "assume and believe the opposite" and tell me what you would have said if the opposite were true?
"And just because you put your ridiculous, unfounded accusations in the form of a question....
I will not object to your calling them "ridiculous" (as it's a subjective kind of thing) but how dare you call them "unfounded" until you can show the provided examples to be so...!?
Get off Brad Pitt's sexuality, Obama's birth certificate, etc. irrelevant blabberings. Who cares if you knew a catholic priest to be a good person for all of your life without knowing that he was a child molester for all of his life...
"his generosity, his pricing a product to make it accessible to a larger audience (when he certainly didn't have to given the history of Snowie at $400)"
Did it ever occur to you that XG was so cheap compared to Jellyfish and Snowie because the seller hadn't invested much in it (i.e. it was stolen goods)...?
"and for his open and honest cooperation on this forum over the years."
It seems like his "open and honest cooperation on this forum" is no more... :(
Oh boy, I get this terrible feeling that XG/Xavier will go down the backgammon history with such a low reputation that only you could dream of and perhaps along with you...?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.