BGonline.org Forums

65R 41 reply is TCTC !!

Posted By: Marty Storer
Date: Friday, 12 May 2017, at 2:09 p.m.

In Response To: 65R 41 reply is TCTC !! (neilkaz)

I've noticed that XG likes 41 minor split here a bit better than Snowie or GNU used to. Maybe it prefers to split with 51 rather than slot. It seems like almost 20 years that I've been slotting with 21, 51, and 41 in reply to opening 65. I discuss my reasons in Backgammon Praxis. I probably won't change now.

Messages In This Thread

• 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 10 May 2017, at 1:53 a.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 10 May 2017, at 5:38 p.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    scotty -- Thursday, 11 May 2017, at 12:18 a.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    Marty Storer -- Friday, 12 May 2017, at 2:09 p.m.
    • 65R-x1, and 65R-x1$-31
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 13 May 2017, at 5:55 p.m.
      • 65R-51 / we have 4 ply
        David Rockwell -- Sunday, 14 May 2017, at 1:14 a.m.
        • Nice RO but this isn't in the OB?
          neilkaz -- Sunday, 14 May 2017, at 2:53 a.m.
        • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 10:07 a.m.
          • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
            Karol Szczerek -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 3:54 p.m.
          • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
            Steven E. Carey -- Tuesday, 23 May 2017, at 12:51 a.m.
      • 65R-x1, and 65R-x1$-31
        Philippe Michel -- Sunday, 21 May 2017, at 9:12 p.m.
      • 65R-51 -- Long 4-ply ROLLOUT (110k)
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 7:35 a.m.