BGonline.org Forums

4-ply cube vs. XGR cube

Posted By: Steven E. Carey
Date: Tuesday, 23 May 2017, at 12:51 a.m.

In Response To: 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube (Timothy Chow)

My normal setting is 3ply move // 4ply cube. It is slightly slower the default 3ply move // XGR cube. I prefer the 4ply cube because I think it is more reliable results than the XGR cube at 2 away and 3 away match scores.

Messages In This Thread

• 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
  neilkaz -- Wednesday, 10 May 2017, at 1:53 a.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 10 May 2017, at 5:38 p.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    scotty -- Thursday, 11 May 2017, at 12:18 a.m.
  • 65R 41 reply is TCTC !!
    Marty Storer -- Friday, 12 May 2017, at 2:09 p.m.
    • 65R-x1, and 65R-x1$-31
      Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 13 May 2017, at 5:55 p.m.
      • 65R-51 / we have 4 ply
        David Rockwell -- Sunday, 14 May 2017, at 1:14 a.m.
        • Nice RO but this isn't in the OB?
          neilkaz -- Sunday, 14 May 2017, at 2:53 a.m.
        • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 10:07 a.m.
          • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
            Karol Szczerek -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 3:54 p.m.
          • 4-ply cube vs. XGR cube
            Steven E. Carey -- Tuesday, 23 May 2017, at 12:51 a.m.
      • 65R-x1, and 65R-x1$-31
        Philippe Michel -- Sunday, 21 May 2017, at 9:12 p.m.
      • 65R-51 -- Long 4-ply ROLLOUT (110k)
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 22 May 2017, at 7:35 a.m.