BGonline.org Forums

Routine double twos?

Posted By: Stick
Date: Saturday, 14 October 2017, at 1:02 a.m.

In Response To: Routine double twos? (Jack Edelson)

Routine, agreed. 11(2) 4(2). Surprised nobody yet has thought the extra builder and coverage on [63 64] is worth the measly two shots.

Stick

Messages In This Thread

• Routine double twos?
  Jack Edelson -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 7:05 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    garyo -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 7:25 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    Mike Clapsadle -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 7:45 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    Christian Munk-Christensen -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 7:59 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    Casper Van der Tak -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 8:34 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    scotty -- Friday, 13 October 2017, at 11:01 p.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    Stick -- Saturday, 14 October 2017, at 1:02 a.m.
    • Routine double twos?
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 14 October 2017, at 1:49 a.m.
  • Routine double twos?
    Fatboy -- Saturday, 14 October 2017, at 7:04 a.m.
  • Routine double twos? -- ROLLOUT and variant
    Jack Edelson -- Saturday, 14 October 2017, at 6:13 p.m.
    • Routine double twos? -- ROLLOUT and more VARIANTS
      Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 15 October 2017, at 3:29 a.m.
      • Routine double twos? -- ROLLOUT and more VARIANTS
        Stick -- Sunday, 15 October 2017, at 7:32 a.m.