|
BGonline.org Forums
You've seen similar before
Posted By: Karol Szczerek In Response To: You've seen similar before (Casper Van der Tak)
Date: Wednesday, 15 November 2017, at 4:19 p.m.
Hmm why do we want to have an efficient recube instead of cash? The first gives <1.0 eq, whereas a cash gives 1.0 eq. To me, question is for 3/1 vs 3/2(2): do we gain enough eq in 3,4,5 & 6 combinations (no doubles) when we can cash vs RD/T, to compensate for the eq loss after we roll ace-something and not have a double vs a better RD/T. I wouldn't be able to estimate this OTB, so I'd look for a deciding factor. I see that 1-1 and 2-2 takes off 2 after 3/2(2) instead of 1 after 3/1, so that would decide it for me.
Or am I totally wrong here?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.