I first jumped from my seat when I saw that one, but I guess it makes sense. We're behind, have a better board and opponent's position is dynamic, so bold plays, trying strong for containing/attacking her blot are thematic. That suggests 13/7 trying for a 5-prime.
Then, why 6/3 instead of 13/10 or 8/5 with the 3? Because it keeps best coverage and spare distribution and slots another vital point at a relatively low cost. Note that almost all hitting 2s are duplicated for White, except a [23]. But even if she gets it and hits, she faces quite a bunch of return shots while still being outboarded.
| 1. | Rollout1 | 13/7 6/3 | eq: -0,172 |
| Player:
Opponent: | 46,54% (G:9,34% B:0,28%)
53,46% (G:13,76% B:0,54%) | Conf.: ± 0,015 (-0,188...-0,157) - [100,0%]
Duration: 7 minutes 13 seconds |
|
| 2. | Rollout1 | 13/7 8/5 | eq: -0,251 (-0,079) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43,50% (G:8,83% B:0,21%)
56,50% (G:11,31% B:0,39%) | Conf.: ± 0,012 (-0,263...-0,240) - [0,0%]
Duration: 6 minutes 22 seconds |
|
| 3. | Rollout1 | 8/2 6/3 | eq: -0,274 (-0,101) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 43,72% (G:9,22% B:0,23%)
56,28% (G:13,54% B:0,54%) | Conf.: ± 0,016 (-0,290...-0,257) - [0,0%]
Duration: 8 minutes 32 seconds |
|
| 4. | Rollout1 | 13/4 | eq: -0,289 (-0,117) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 42,18% (G:8,04% B:0,15%)
57,82% (G:9,34% B:0,35%) | Conf.: ± 0,013 (-0,302...-0,277) - [0,0%]
Duration: 7 minutes 07 seconds |
|
| 5. | Rollout1 | 13/10 8/2 | eq: -0,297 (-0,125) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 42,43% (G:8,77% B:0,22%)
57,57% (G:11,94% B:0,53%) | Conf.: ± 0,012 (-0,310...-0,285) - [0,0%]
Duration: 8 minutes 47 seconds |
|
| 6. | Rollout1 | 13/10 13/7 | eq: -0,324 (-0,152) |
| Player:
Opponent: | 41,55% (G:7,72% B:0,20%)
58,45% (G:10,75% B:0,32%) | Conf.: ± 0,012 (-0,336...-0,313) - [0,0%]
Duration: 6 minutes 51 seconds |
|
| |
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|
