BGonline.org Forums

Typo, what typo?

Posted By: playBunny
Date: Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 11:53 a.m.

In Response To: or worse! (Maik Stiebler)

What fascinates me about typos, even the missing-negative ones where the word "not" is omitted, is how often I read the intended meaning and don't notice the typo until the follow-up post which points it out. It's then a "what typo?" and I have to reread the original post in order to find it. ;-)

Messages In This Thread

• Risk aversion
  Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 3:27 a.m.
  • Risk aversion
    Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 5:18 a.m.
    • Risk aversion
      neilkaz -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 2:41 p.m.
      • Risk aversion
        Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 7:03 p.m.
  • Risk aversion
    phil Simborg -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 6:57 a.m.
    • Risk aversion
      playBunny -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 11:48 a.m.
      • Risk aversion
        Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 12:35 p.m.
        • Risk aversion
          Frank Berger -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 6:38 p.m.
  • Risk aversion
    Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 11:22 a.m.
    • or worse!
      Maik Stiebler -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 11:25 a.m.
      • Typo, what typo?
        playBunny -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 11:53 a.m.
  • Risk aversion
    Frank Berger -- Thursday, 30 July 2009, at 6:40 p.m.