BGonline.org Forums
rollout, not that i agree
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 7:48 p.m.
In Response To: rollout, not that i agree (neilkaz)
The huge stack on the 6pt seems to be glossed over here. Building a prime and cracking your opponent's timing after any play is not as easy as it looks unless the dice do some huge cooperation for you.
I don't know what I would have played OTB, maybe depends on who I was playing or what my feeling was.
Messages In This Thread
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 12:52 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:21 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 1:28 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
John O'Hagan -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:00 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:32 a.m.
- 44 to play vs potential backgame
Keene -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 4:43 a.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
Adam Versaw -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:08 p.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
Stick -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 2:16 p.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 6:20 p.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
neilkaz -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 6:45 p.m.
- rollout, not that i agree
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 7:48 p.m.
- Since you don't seem to mind points 6 apart...
Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 3:15 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.