BGonline.org Forums

My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Monday, 21 December 2009, at 9:44 p.m.

In Response To: My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's (Neil Robins)

Neil Robins wrote:

2 ply can quite often show you as too good when opponent has some off.

Ha! I've argued before that the bots really should never evaluate as too good when the opponent has some off, but didn't manage to convince anybody (at least, anybody that responded to me). Your observation here is another excellent argument for re-programming the bots' behavior in this case.

Messages In This Thread

• 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
  Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 9:28 p.m.
  • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
    Stick -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 10:04 p.m.
    • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
      Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 10:23 p.m.
      • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
        Stick -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 10:25 p.m.
        • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 10:31 p.m.
          • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
            Stick -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 11:16 p.m.
            • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
              Timothy Chow -- Saturday, 19 December 2009, at 11:23 p.m.
              • 3-ply cube sometimes stronger than 2-ply cube
                Stick -- Sunday, 20 December 2009, at 12:02 a.m.
  • My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's
    neilkaz -- Monday, 21 December 2009, at 4:03 p.m.
    • My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's
      Neil Robins -- Monday, 21 December 2009, at 8:39 p.m.
      • My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's
        Timothy Chow -- Monday, 21 December 2009, at 9:44 p.m.
      • My recommendation for when to use GNU 3 ply cube in RO's
        Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 22 December 2009, at 7:50 a.m.