|
BGonline.org Forums
61P-44B-61?
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 61P-44B-61? (Leonardo Jerkovic)
Date: Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 11:31 p.m.
I don't have a full rollout for this.
I do have a Snowie truncated rollout:
[U S16] 2t
That is, U (Up 24/18 24/23) beats S (24/23 13/7) by a live cube margin of .016. (The cube-adj. and cubeless margins are .010 and .005, respectively.) The number of trials (2592) is written as "2t" rather than "2k" to distinguish the rollout as truncated.
As Matt implies, Blue would rather not play the ace if allowed to pass it. That is, 51 is a better roll than 61 here.
The theme of avoiding a one-checker step-up from 24pt to 23pt (versus three checkers on Opp's 8pt and especially against four) is a very common theme arising in my third roll double aces rollouts.
Nack
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.