BGonline.org Forums

61P-31P+C=4a-1a?

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Friday, 25 December 2009, at 8:51 a.m.

In Response To: 61P-31P+C=4a-1a? (Nack Ballard)

As I noted if you are using DMP EMG this is too simplistic as one also has to take into account whether the position is more or less gammonish than usual.

I don't really see anything wrong with your reasoning for how you got to .008 (DMP-EMG, not GS or higher-EMG), but I just have a feeling that the ROs will put it higher, like .011 or .012. Don't ask me why because it doesn't make sense.

Messages In This Thread

• 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 11:05 a.m.
  • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
    Stick -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 2:25 p.m.
  • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 4:50 p.m.
    • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 6:59 p.m.
  • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
    David Rockwell -- Thursday, 24 December 2009, at 6:15 p.m.
  • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
    Nack Ballard -- Friday, 25 December 2009, at 8:09 a.m.
    • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 25 December 2009, at 8:51 a.m.
      • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a?
        Nack Ballard -- Friday, 25 December 2009, at 11:01 a.m.
  • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a? Results & ROs
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Friday, 25 December 2009, at 5:10 p.m.
    • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a? Results & ROs
      neilkaz -- Friday, 25 December 2009, at 7:44 p.m.
      • 61P-31P+C=4a-1a? Results & ROs
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 26 December 2009, at 3:41 a.m.