BGonline.org Forums

41S-62H-6x, comparisons

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 7:07 p.m.

In Response To: 41S-62H-65 ROLLOUT (David Rockwell)

Yes, 41S-62H-63 is a good idea to roll out as well. I didn't mention it because White's 16pt checker does not have a direct shot at her 9pt.

In other words, for 41S-62H-65 and 41S-62H-64, only the D/U comparison is interesting -- they're of a like kind. For 41S-62H-63, R is introduced as a strong contender.

If you're going to roll out 41S-62H-63, you might want to roll out 41S-62H-61 (where U and R become the same play) as well, to verify the trend. That is, I would expect D do best relative to U with 65, and gradually worsen with 64, 63, and 61 for reasons discussed in my earlier post. I'm guessing the closest D/U decision is with 64.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 41S-62H-65
  Gregg Cattanach -- Monday, 28 December 2009, at 1:16 p.m.
  • 41S-62H-65
    Leonardo Jerkovic -- Monday, 28 December 2009, at 1:32 p.m.
  • 41S-62H-65
    David Rockwell -- Monday, 28 December 2009, at 1:49 p.m.
  • 41S-62H-65
    neilkaz -- Monday, 28 December 2009, at 6:16 p.m.
  • 41S-62H-65
    Stick -- Monday, 28 December 2009, at 6:50 p.m.
  • 41S-62H-65
    Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 1:06 a.m.
    • 41S-62H-65 ROLLOUT
      Leonardo Jerkovic -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 1:34 a.m.
      • 41S-62H-65 ROLLOUT
        Stick -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 2:08 a.m.
        • 41S-62H-65 ROLLOUT
          Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 10:56 a.m.
          • 41S-62H-65 ROLLOUT
            David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 3:47 p.m.
            • 41S-62H-6x, comparisons
              Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 7:07 p.m.
              • 41S-62H-6x, comparisons
                David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 7:31 p.m.