BGonline.org Forums

Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 8:59 p.m.

In Response To: Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem (neilkaz)

I've noticed that Kit writes the regular score, followed by the away score in parentheses and in a smaller superscript. I haven't learned superscript in html, so I'll fake it below by putting the main score in bold. (Maybe someone else can duplicate this with reduced-size superscript).

1 (-6) 0 (-7)
2 (-5) 0 (-7)
2 (-5) 1 (-6)
4 (-3) 1 (-6), etc.

Would you find this just as objectionable, less objectionable or unobjectionable?

Just curious. I might try this sometime if I knew that it were neither disallowed nor irritating to my opponent somehow (and I'm sure it hasn't even crossed Kit's mind that either might be the case), though I can't say it is an important issue to me.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
  Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 8:15 p.m.
  • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
    Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 8:23 p.m.
    • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
      Stick -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 8:27 p.m.
      • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
        Ray Kershaw -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 9:03 p.m.
        • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
          Tom Keith -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 10:01 p.m.
          • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
            Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 11:42 p.m.
      • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
        Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 30 December 2009, at 12:58 a.m.
    • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
      Stein Kulseth -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 9:06 p.m.
  • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
    Rich Munitz -- Tuesday, 29 December 2009, at 10:02 p.m.
  • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 30 December 2009, at 12:31 a.m.
    • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
      christian munk-christensen -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 9:31 a.m.
      • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 6:21 p.m.
        • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 31 December 2009, at 8:59 p.m.
          • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
            Gregg Cattanach -- Monday, 4 January 2010, at 1:55 p.m.
  • Another Rule 1.5 interpretation problem
    Jason Lee -- Wednesday, 30 December 2009, at 3:10 a.m.