BGonline.org Forums

ultimate42/ partial result

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Monday, 25 January 2010, at 6:12 a.m.

In Response To: ultimate42/ partial result (Bob Koca)

I see. It must be 6/5 2/off, so that 3s play better. I considered that briefly, but didn't think it was worth both sacrificing a checker off and leaving an immediate shot on double 3s. Nice problem, Bob! (Not much difference, though, right?)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• ultimate42
  Bob Koca -- Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 3:13 a.m.
  • I mean 21 bearoff to play vs 3 pt game *NM*
    Bob Koca -- Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 3:15 a.m.
  • ultimate42
    Stick -- Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 3:35 a.m.
  • ultimate42
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 11:02 a.m.
  • ultimate42
    Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 24 January 2010, at 7:23 p.m.
  • ultimate42
    Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 3:18 a.m.
    • ultimate42/ partial result
      Bob Koca -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 5:32 a.m.
      • ultimate42/ partial result
        Stick -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 6:10 a.m.
        • ultimate42/ partial result
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 3:26 p.m.
          • ultimate42/ partial result
            Stick -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 3:47 p.m.
            • ultimate42/ partial result
              Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 4:56 p.m.
        • ultimate42/ partial result
          Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 4:56 a.m.
      • ultimate42/ partial result
        Nack Ballard -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 6:12 a.m.
        • ultimate42/ partial result
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 25 January 2010, at 3:18 p.m.
  • ultimate42 RO
    Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 7:14 a.m.
    • ultimate42 RO
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 26 January 2010, at 4:18 p.m.