[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

64S 41 XG 4 ply RO

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Saturday, 13 March 2010, at 3:33 p.m.

While looking here at Stick's posted RO results for something interesting to test at a higher level of strength, I came across this sequence which intrigued me since the results of the RO's for 41 after 62S and 63S indicate that building with the 4 is correct and since I was unaware that splitting 24/20 was rather clearly correct after 64S (previously I'd seen GNU results indicating that it was close)

Anyhow, next up will be 63S 41 and I'll leave it to the theoreticians here to tell us why, after hitting with the ace, splitting the 4 is better vs 64S and building 13/9 is likely better vs 63S.




is Player 2

score: 0
pip: 157
Money session
Jacoby Beaver
pip: 167
score: 0

is Player 1
XGID=-a----EaC---dE--ac-e----B-:0:0:1:41:0:0:3:0:10
to play 41

1.Rollout124/20 8/7* eq: -0.108
Player:
Opponent:		 47.53% (G:12.96% B:0.75%)
52.47% (G:15.15% B:0.88%)		Conf: ± 0.005 (-0.113...-0.103)
Duration: 1 day 04 hours 07 minutes
2.Rollout113/9 8/7* eq: -0.117 (-0.009)
Player:
Opponent:		 47.48% (G:13.60% B:0.77%)
52.52% (G:16.20% B:1.17%)		Conf: ± 0.005 (-0.122...-0.112)
Duration: 1 day 01 hour 51 minutes
1 15552 Games rolled with Variance Reduction.
Moves and cube decisions: 4 ply

eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.13

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.