BGonline.org Forums

62S-32 XG 4 ply RO

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 11:18 p.m.

In Response To: 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO (neilkaz)

For me, half the fun of studying the openings is the ability to draw reactions from onlookers. From this point of view W is clearly best but U isn't so bad. No way I'm playing S though.

Besides, we still have no real assurance that the bots of the future won't choose W over U.

Messages In This Thread

• 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
  neilkaz -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:16 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 10:34 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Bob Koca -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 11:16 p.m.
  • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 20 May 2010, at 11:18 p.m.
    • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
      Chuck Bower -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 1:29 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        David Rockwell -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 2:40 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        Stick -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 3:19 a.m.
      • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
        Daniel Murphy -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 6:16 a.m.
        • 62S-32 XG 4 ply RO
          Chase -- Friday, 21 May 2010, at 5:57 p.m.
          • BEACON (with diagrams)
            Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 23 May 2010, at 8:04 p.m.
            • BEACON (with diagrams)
              Chase -- Monday, 24 May 2010, at 4:42 p.m.
  • 62S-32, data
    Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 23 May 2010, at 8:58 p.m.