[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Ruling in Chicago

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 4 June 2010, at 2:19 p.m.

In Response To: Ruling in Chicago (Steve Mellen)

Steve Mellen wrote:

I think it is pretty unrealistic to assume that even where there is no dispute as to what happened, maybe there really is a dispute.

I'm not making any such assumption. Would you be in favor of rewriting the rules so that an illegal move can be pointed out even after the opponent has rolled the dice? It may still be the case that there is no dispute as to what the previous roll is.

Making a rule that picking up the dice condones an illegal move does not amount to stating that picking up the dice creates a dispute. It just rules that picking up the dice condones an illegal move. If one is going to make a rule, then I'm just saying it seems consistent with the spirit of other rules involving a single set of dice that destroying the physical evidence ought to end one's timeframe for correcting an illegal move.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.