BGonline.org Forums

32S-54H-42P-F-41 and variants, revisited

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 10:49 p.m.

	179
32S-54H-42P-F-41	160

In my original post, I replied to Stick's post on the position diagrammed above. All five respondents chose @ (anchor, 24/20 21/20), which does look clear.

I proposed the two variants below. One of White's 6pt spares is moved to her 24pt (left-hand diagram) or to her 21pt (right-hand diagram).

197 32S-54H-42P-21H-31H-F-41 160

194 32S-54H-42P-42E-31H-F-41 160

I threw on some truncated rollouts (1296+ trials). Here are the results:

Left-hand position: [P @13]. That is, P (Point, 11/7 8/7) beats @ (anchor, 24/21 24/20) by .013, providing a contrast to the original position (above it) where @ is clearly best.

Right-hand position: [A @10 X39 P44 x50 h64]. Translation: A (Attack, 8/4 6/5*) is best, @ (anchor, 24/20 21/20) is -.010, X (hit-and-split/scoot, 21/20 8/4*) is -.039, P (Point, 11/7 8/7) is -.044, x (alt hit-and-split, 24/23 8/4*) is -.050, and h (alt hit, 11/10 8/4*) is -.064. I'm not planning to do a full rollout of either position, but if someone else feels so inspired... :)

The sexy hit-and-slot play (A) that topped the trunc deserves its own diagram (below).

32S-54H-42P-42E-31H-F-41A (after-position)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 32S-54H-42P-F-41 and variants, revisited
  Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 10:49 p.m.
  • Amazing! *NM*
    Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 26 August 2010, at 11:37 p.m.
  • XG Not Turned On By "Sexy" Checker Play
    Paul Weaver -- Friday, 27 August 2010, at 9:44 a.m.
    • XG Not Turned On By "Sexy" Checker Play
      Leonardo Jerkovic -- Friday, 27 August 2010, at 9:46 a.m.
    • Rollout of "Sexy" Play Extended to 5184
      Paul Weaver -- Friday, 27 August 2010, at 10:32 a.m.
      • Rollout of "Sexy" Play Extended to 5184
        Nack Ballard -- Friday, 27 August 2010, at 5:56 p.m.