BGonline.org Forums

Ruling Question

Posted By: Bill Calton
Date: Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:11 p.m.

Tournament Match.

Player 1 makes an illegal move. He bears off Player 2's checker, moving 5/0ff, 4/3.

So now Player 2 is on roll. Having 14 checkers, he claims no gammon.

Proper ruling?

	is Player 2 score: 3 pip: 176 7 point match pip: 27 score: 0 is Player 1
XGID=bDCCBa------d----c-e------:1:-1:1:51:0:3:0:7:10
to play 51

eXtreme Gammon Version: 1.21

Messages In This Thread

• Ruling Question
  Bill Calton -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:11 p.m.
  • Ruling Question
    rory -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:28 p.m.
    • Ruling Question
      Bob Koca -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:54 p.m.
      • Ruling Question
        Rich Munitz -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 6:05 p.m.
        • Ruling Question
          Bob Koca -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 6:18 p.m.
          • Ruling Question
            Rich Munitz -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 7:18 p.m.
            • Ruling Question
              Matt Cohn-Geier -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 8:10 p.m.
              • Ruling Question
                Chiva Tafazzoli -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
                • Ruling Question
                  Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 10:30 p.m.
              • Ruling Question
                garyo -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 3:03 a.m.
              • Ruling Question
                Rich Munitz -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 6:24 a.m.
                • Ruling Question
                  Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 12:17 p.m.
                  • Ruling Question
                    Rich Munitz -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 8:57 p.m.
            • Ruling Question
              Bob Koca -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 8:22 p.m.
            • Ruling Question
              Steve Mellen -- Monday, 29 November 2010, at 2:37 p.m.
              • Ruling Question
                Rich Munitz -- Monday, 29 November 2010, at 4:25 p.m.
      • "illegal move" too broad of a rule here?
        Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 10:04 p.m.
        • +1
          Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 7:00 a.m.
    • Ruling Question
      Rich Munitz -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:55 p.m.
      • Ruling Question
        garyo -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 2:48 a.m.
    • Ruling Question
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 12:28 a.m.
  • Ruling Question
    Chiva Tafazzoli -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 5:49 p.m.
  • Ruling Question
    Stick -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 8:24 p.m.
    • +1 *NM*
      Chiva Tafazzoli -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 8:45 p.m.
    • Ruling Question
      neilkaz -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 9:53 p.m.
      • Ruling Question
        Chiva Tafazzoli -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 10:03 p.m.
        • Ruling Question
          neilkaz -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 10:04 p.m.
          • Ruling Question
            Casper van der Tak -- Saturday, 27 November 2010, at 10:22 p.m.
            • Ruling Question
              Stein Kulseth -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 4:50 p.m.
              • Ruling Question
                Casper van der Tak -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 11:06 p.m.
                • Calcutta field ethics
                  Chuck Bower -- Monday, 29 November 2010, at 4:53 p.m.
          • Patricia Geoffroy may not agree about the calcuttas ;-) *NM*
            Michael Petch -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 1:44 a.m.
  • Ruling Question
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 5:48 a.m.
    • Ruling Question
      Sam Pottle -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 9:34 a.m.
    • Ruling Question
      Chiva Tafazzoli -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 11:28 a.m.
  • Ruling Question
    phil simborg -- Sunday, 28 November 2010, at 11:29 p.m.