BGonline.org Forums

XG suggestion

Posted By: Marty Storer
Date: Monday, 31 January 2011, at 3:38 p.m.

Apologies in advance if the problems I'm about to mention are just Operator Error or failure to find the right documentation.

But even if there are clearly documented remedies I don't know of, I would suggest that XG not accept user input that changes a position being rolled out, or that changes a position that's part of an analyzed match being perused.

I've had problems with that in the past--I fat-fingered a change to a position I was in the process of rolling out, and I couldn't figure out how to undo the change, and I lost some data. The only thing I came up with was to let the rollout complete and then record final data by hand (from the pop-up monitoring window that has ongoing equities and confidence levels).

Locking out user input for the situations mentioned above would make the interface simpler and cleaner. Just my $0.02.

Messages In This Thread

• XG suggestion
  Marty Storer -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 3:38 p.m.
  • XG suggestion
    Chuck Bower -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 4:59 p.m.
  • XG suggestion
    Stick -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 7:24 p.m.
    • XG suggestion
      eXtreme Gammon -- Monday, 31 January 2011, at 8:16 p.m.